Approximately £2,000 to £2,400 per month is what the foster parents lose now they are no longer housing three children in Rotherham. Could this be an underlying reason for their going to press about the decision to remove the children? . This a professional dispute by a new professional workforce, a workforced established by the state for financial reasons more than anything else such as the need for the child to have a stable environment above all else.
Rather than go through the channels available to the foster parents (or their fostering agency) they decided to go to the press. In the best interests of the child? One wonders how did this suburban couple come to talk to the press in the first place? Was it suggested to them by their agency or did they call UKIP? Who suggested they embark on this plan of action and was it for the betterment of the children?