Screen Dance. The Art of Defining Me

“The Arts Council criteria for funding is to conform
So if they pay the revolution the revolution will perform
And if you can write along this dotted line your role in this society
Then you can play allegiance to the great race robbery
And with a knowing glint  they’ll say you can apply
Then they’ll stuff your open mouths with a piece of American Pie
The arts council criteria for funding is to conform
And as we are paying the revolution, the revolution will perform
And like puppets on barbed wire
We dance in this fire”

ArtofDefiningMe_web_Jun13It’s an  excerpt from  “The Show Goes On”  in my first book Tender Fingers in a Clenched Fist  published  by Bogle L’ouverture  in 1988 and  funded by yes  The Arts Council.    Such are the seemingly stark declamations within  The Art of Defining Me  (left pic) shown at Rich Mix last night.    Kamala Devam and Seeta patel  join film maker Maria Åkesson to create a three part film using dance, physical theatre and original script and sound design. Dance clearly needs film more than film needs dance or so it would have us believe, so  it’s important that the camera was seduced  by dance into becoming a dancer itself.

seeta patelThe flower created on the table in the first piece in which Devam is interviewed and the trick of the eye (Is the glass a mirror?) of  Patel’s (pic on left) piece enitirely performed in a box of four doors  clearly displays what was important about the art of defining me. The art. The art The art.  The question of whether or not artists are complicit with the criteria of their funders is brilliantly executed (killed)  in  Kamala’s section of the film – The Interview.  The question is… is it any good.   And it really  is.

The panel and audience discussion that followed was taken up with an  idea of identity that threatened to undermine the film’s main  point. Identity is as complex and beautiful and big and undefinable as our  Galaxy. The arts council struggles with its own identity at least as much as the artist. And isn’t all  art driven by identity whether Damien Hirst or Satyajit ray.  It is arts council’s responsibility to fund and respect tax payers money. It is the artists responsibility to create. These are not conflicting currency.

So let’s talk about the art of The Art of Defining Me:  the entire dance in a box not bigPS1_0878 enough to swing a samosa, the revealing head stand in the middle of the interview, the bindi mirror window piece.  I look forward to more from this unique team to brighten the predictability, the mediocrity which yes fulfills criteria and yes ticks boxes. The responsibility to create is the artist’s alone.  And the answer to the dichotomy outlined in my poem and this wonderful screen dance is inside the work. The work should always be outside and  beyond the structures set up to define and/or fund it. And that is exactly what  The Art That Defines Me is.  Zoom in on the detail and let the story unfold and unfold and unfold to make with great effort something  effortlessly beautiful and complex: political, personal, artistic, classically informed modernity performed and  uncompromisingly aware.  Bravo Seeta, Kamala and Maria. And bravo Arts Council.

3 thoughts on “Screen Dance. The Art of Defining Me

  1. I think Art is not hung up on a definition or an acceptance..although what makes something a work of art comes mainly from the intention of he artist…the audience has become increasingly a more influential part of the jigsaw..and the power of Performance Arts is driving that vehicle…thanks to many artists who patron Live Art such as Maria Abramovich who has given the audience a greater sense of power as great as her sense of her role as an Artist. Art is in everything & everything is in Art…to start analyzing art is fruitless but each individual work of art relies on critique to

    • Become to its viewer, something they call Art. Dance is probably one of the earliest recognized forms of human expressions defined as Art..Art is to me, a spectrumn of various human expressions springing forth from the Artists interaction with a particular catalyst..that catalyst is either positive or negative…the presentation of the piece of work…is what is required from

      • His/her individual skill set…making something ones one..Original. It is pointless to define Art or Artists but it is all very possible to define everything external to those two states..through Art. Yours is a very interesting great to catch that screening.
        Best regards.
        P.S: My opinion above is one of a practicing is soul food for who ever enjoys it..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *